llll

Free Subscription via Email:

Wednesday 3 October 2012

2008 election recap: a political tsunami



The March 2008 elections in Malaysia was termed a "political tsunami," a phrase which became widely used in the aftermath of the ruling Barisan Nasional (National Front) swinging from its strongest parliamentary mandate in history to its worst electoral performance ever.
The nearly 12 per cent swing in popular vote to opposition parties, which has since coalesced into the Pakatan Rakyat (People's Pact), resulted in Barisan losing its customary two-thirds "supermajority" in Parliament.
From having 198 lawmakers in the 222-seat federal legislative, Barisan only returned 140 MPs and ceded five state governments in the multi-ethnic federation to Pakatan.
Then known as the Alliance, the United Malays National Organisation-led (Umno) coalition has previously failed to take two-thirds of the federal legislative only once, a result that preceded the racial riots of May 13, 1969.
Malays and Chinese, the two largest communities in the country, had clashed after the majority of the latter had voted for the opposition, resulting in deaths which have been reported to be anywhere from the official 196 to thousands.
No such trouble followed the 2008 polls, as Malays, who make up about 60 per cent of the 27 million population, were nearly evenly divided between the two coalitions.
While Chinese dissented against perceived government bias towards Malays in 1969, 2008 saw collective anger towards Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's administration.
Abdullah, who has led Barisan to its best and worst electoral performances, took over from Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Malaysia's longest-serving prime minister, in 2003 with the promise of reforms and an all-out battle against endemic corruption.
But the strength of his 2004 mandate was followed by several controversies, including soaring cost of living underlined by record prices for subsidised fuel, with petrol prices doubling during his tenure to RM2.70 per litre in mid-2008.
His fight against corruption was also perceived to be lip service as best highlighted by the failure to bring any charges after the infamous "Lingam video" surfaced in September 2007, in which senior lawyer V. K. Lingam appears to be making deals to fix judicial appointments.
The dismantling of several Mahathir-era legacies only resulted in the former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, still highly influential in Umno after 22 years in power, making scathing attacks against his successor from 2006 onwards.
Events that earned Dr Mahathir's ire included the cancelling of a new bridge-link to Singapore which he said would allow ships to bypass the island republic and benefit local ports, as well as the new management installed at Proton, the national carmaker he launched in 1983 and is still advisor of.
When Abdullah's administration did move towards reforms, it proved to contribute to his undoing.
Former Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was released from jail in 2004 after the Federal Court overturned his sodomy conviction, allowing the de facto Parti Keadilan Rakyat (People's Justice Party) leader to lead the opposition pact to stunning gains in 2008.
Dr Mahathir had managed to keep his government together in the 1999 elections by wooing Chinese voters a year after controversially sacking his deputy Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, an Islamist who was popular among Malays.
Anwar seemed to be forgotten when Abdullah took over in 2003, many believing that being rid of Dr Mahathir was enough "Reformasi" for the time being. But Abdullah's reputation for weak leadership and flip-flopping on important decisions alienated the three main ethnic groups, with close to 70 per cent of Indians voting against him.
Jerome Martin is a political analyst and humourist. Some might say both are the same. But he finds that humour can in fact be used to reveal the truth.



0 comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Paste This Code Below At Your Blog/Site ;)